Louisiana’s hands-free law turns on more than whether a phone is mounted. Vehicle movement, the task being performed, the purpose of the use, and the location can all matter. A 2026 amendment also added a specific school-zone definition, including time windows around the start and end of school.
The baseline rule is in R.S. 32:59. The school-zone amendment appears in Act 677 of 2026, effective August 1, 2026 according to the HB 844 legislative history. The compiled statute page retrieved for this research still displayed the earlier definitions, making it necessary to read the enacted amendment alongside that page.
What the 2026 school-zone amendment adds
For this phone-use statute, the amendment describes a designated area adjacent to a public or private kindergarten-through-twelfth-grade school or a postsecondary institution, properly marked with official school-warning or similar traffic-control signage. Its boundary language requires an extension of at least 250 feet before the beginning of the school zone.
The stated active periods are 60 minutes before and after school begins, and 60 minutes before and after school ends. Actual school schedules and the designated, marked area therefore matter. This definition addresses R.S. 32:59; it should not be treated as a complete statement of every school-zone speed rule.
Scroll horizontally to see all columns. Use the arrow keys when the table is focused.
| Period | Window under the amendment’s timing language |
|---|---|
| Around the start of school | 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. |
| Around dismissal | 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. |
That example assumes those are the school’s actual start and end times. It does not decide the effect of a special schedule, the sufficiency of signs at a particular location, or a disputed boundary. Photographs of the signage and documentation of the schedule can resolve facts that a label such as near a school cannot.
Everyday phone-use scenarios
Scroll horizontally to see all columns. Use the arrow keys when the table is focused.
| Situation | What the statute says to examine |
|---|---|
| Reading or typing messages while the vehicle moves | Subsection B expressly covers text-based communications and manual entries. A dashboard mount does not make typing permissible. |
| Holding the phone while driving | Holding or physically supporting the device is included in prohibited operation, subject to the statute’s specific definitions and exceptions. |
| Initiating a hands-free call | The hands-free definition permits use of a hand to activate, deactivate, or initiate a device function. That is different from browsing or entering a sequence of text commands. |
| Viewing hands-free navigation | Subsection C(6) expressly permits viewing navigation data or images through a hands-free GPS. Manually entering a destination while moving raises a different question. |
| Stopped at a red signal | The lawfully stationary definition includes a vehicle stopped in a travel lane in compliance with a traffic signal, even while in gear. The phone prohibition does not automatically make that stationary use illegal. |
| Moving again while still looking at the device | The stationary exception no longer describes the entire sequence. The timing of renewed movement matters. |
| Reporting an emergency or serious road hazard | Subsection C contains specified exceptions. The purpose and supporting records matter. |
| For-hire driver communicating with a dispatcher | The statute provides a specific exception involving an affixed device. It is not a blanket exception for every work call or application. |
The stationary provision also requires lawful circumstances. Stopping wherever convenient is not a general permission to disregard other traffic laws. Nor does lawful phone use establish that it was attentive or reasonable in the circumstances.
Location affects enforcement and fines
Under subsection D, a violation in a school zone or highway construction zone is a primary offense with a stated $250 fine. In other locations, it is a secondary offense when an officer detains the driver for an alleged violation of another provision of the relevant traffic chapter, with a stated $100 fine. The statute allows specified reductions tied to community service.
If a person is involved in a crash at the time of the violation, the statute doubles the applicable fine and requires the investigating officer to indicate the device use on the accident report. Its warning-only provision applies to violations before January 1, 2026. The phone law became effective in 2025, but the warning period and the later school-zone amendment are separate dates.
For a secondary-offense citation, subsection E requires a clear and unobstructed view of prohibited use. It restricts device seizure, searches, and custodial arrest based solely on that secondary offense, with the stated warrant qualification. Those limits should not be paraphrased as a universal prohibition on searches arising from any circumstances involving a phone.
After a crash, reconstruct the sequence
A phone citation does not establish every element of a civil injury claim, and the absence of a citation does not establish attention. An officer arriving afterward may never have seen the activity. A carrier record may show a connection without revealing whether the driver looked at the screen.
Useful evidence can include vehicle movement, synchronized video, witness observations, device and application activity obtained through proper process, dispatch records, signal timing, and the physical evidence of braking or impact. Preserve original recordings and timestamps. For a school-zone dispute, add signs, location measurements, and the actual school schedule.
The civil question is whether conduct contributed to the crash and the claimed harm. A prohibited phone task unrelated to why the collision happened presents a different case from distraction that caused a driver to miss a pedestrian or a stopped vehicle.
Our distracted-driving guide discusses prevention and preservation. The article on driver-monitoring systems addresses another possible source of evidence. The Baton Rouge car accident practice considers those records together with roadway, medical, and witness evidence.
Research date: October 16, 2026. The school schedule is hypothetical. The 2026 enacted amendment is cited separately from the compiled statutory text.
Related Louisiana guidance. Our traffic-signal guide addresses another set of road rules that can matter in a crash investigation. For school transportation, our school-bus seat-belt guide distinguishes vehicle standards, state requirements, and the records available to parents. Browse the full Louisiana Legal Research collection for additional topics.