Tolentino Ramirez-Cornejo Killed When SUV Strikes Lafayette Home on SE Evangeline Thruway


Tolentino Ramirez-Cornejo died when the Chevrolet Tahoe he was riding in left Southeast Evangeline Thruway and struck a house in Lafayette early on September 6, 2026. Two other passengers were injured, including one whose injuries were described as severe. Police arrested the driver, Justyce Griffith, on charges that include vehicular homicide and driving while intoxicated.

According to reporting based on Lafayette Police Department statements, officers responded around 3 a.m. near 15th Street. The 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe was traveling north when it departed the roadway to the right and struck a residence. Ramirez-Cornejo died at the scene. A September 7 report said another passenger was in critical condition, but that description does not establish the person’s condition today.

Acadiana News First also reported that the collision displaced the homeowner. No report reviewed for this article establishes whether anyone inside the house was injured.

The question is how the Tahoe left the roadway

This was not a collision between two vehicles at an intersection. The Tahoe traveled off SE Evangeline Thruway and into a home. That makes the vehicle’s path from the travel lane to the building a central part of the investigation.

Investigators should be able to compare the Tahoe’s final position and damage with any curb, shoulder, tire, or roadway marks and the precise point where it struck the residence. Available video from nearby businesses or homes could show whether the SUV drifted, turned suddenly or braked before leaving the road. Those are questions to investigate, not conclusions the current reporting answers.

The home is also part of the collision evidence. Photographs and measurements of the damaged wall and debris field may help show the SUV’s angle and the force of the building impact. Repair work can change that evidence, which is one reason early documentation matters.

The Tahoe and the impairment evidence should be preserved

Police reported that Griffith tested over the legal alcohol limit and booked her on vehicular homicide, operating while intoxicated, two counts of first-degree vehicular negligent injuring, careless operation and a driver’s-license charge. Those are allegations and charges, not a conviction or a final civil finding.

If Babcock Injury Lawyers were retained by Ramirez-Cornejo’s family or an injured passenger, we would seek preservation of the Tahoe before repairs or disposal and determine whether its electronic systems hold useful pre-impact data. Depending on the vehicle and equipment, recorded information may help address speed, braking and the sequence immediately before impact.

We would also seek the actual alcohol-testing records, including the test method, collection time and results, rather than relying on an arrest summary alone. That information must be evaluated alongside the roadway evidence. An allegation of intoxication does not by itself explain every mechanical step that led to the crash.

A criminal prosecution and a civil claim answer different questions

The criminal case will concern whether prosecutors can prove the charged offenses. A civil case would separately examine what caused the Tahoe to leave the road, the injuries and losses that followed, and which people or insurers may be legally responsible.

Louisiana Civil Code article 2315.4 also permits exemplary damages in certain intoxicated-driving cases, but only when its specific elements are proven, including causation and the required reckless or wanton disregard. An arrest alone does not establish that entitlement.

For the family, it is important to identify any applicable wrongful death and survival claims, along with the vehicle owner’s insurance and any other coverage that may apply. The injured passengers have their own medical and economic evidence to develop. The homeowner’s property loss presents a different set of damages. None of these questions is resolved simply because an arrest was made.

Our Lafayette car accident page discusses how evidence and insurance claims are evaluated, and our Louisiana fatal crash investigation guide explains what families can do before an investigation is complete.

What we would want answered for this family

What happened during the final seconds before the Tahoe left the northbound roadway? Which passenger was seated where, and what injuries did each person suffer? What insurance coverage existed on the Tahoe and for the people involved? And what does the actual testing evidence show?

These are concrete questions that can shape a serious injury or wrongful death claim. They also explain why our firm begins with evidence preservation, coverage investigation and preparation for the insurer’s likely defenses. That approach is part of The Babcock Benefit.

Sources and what remains unknown

Police had not publicly released a final reconstruction, the precise sequence of the roadway departure, the actual blood-alcohol test record, or a final disposition of the criminal charges in the reporting reviewed. Accounts also differ on one injured passenger’s initial condition. The descriptions above are attributed to their respective reporting dates. This article provides general legal information and does not imply that Babcock Injury Lawyers represents anyone involved.

For Tolentino Ramirez-Cornejo’s family and the injured passengers

You do not have to know yet whether a civil claim exists or who a court would find at fault. But the Tahoe, building-impact evidence, available video and testing records should be addressed before they disappear or become harder to obtain.

If this crash affected your family, call Babcock Injury Lawyers at (225) 500-5000 or contact us online. We can explain what we would investigate and what evidence may need protection, without suggesting that we already represent anyone involved.